CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

分叉支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial Validation of bifurcation DEFINITION criteria and comparison of stenting strategies in true left main bifurcation lesions Classification and treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: putting the Medina classification to the test ‘Small bifurcation?’ CT myocardial mass volume measurements change therapeutic strategy in coronary artery disease Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study One Versus 2-stent Strategy for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions in the Context of a Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Multicenter Registry T and small protrusion (TAP) vs double kissing crush technique: Insights from in-vitro models Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Bifurcation Coronary Lesions.The 15th Consensus Document from the European Bifurcation Club

Clinical Trial2018 Jan;29(1):30-38.

JOURNAL:Coron Artery Dis. Article Link

A randomized trial of bifurcation stenting technique in chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary intervention

Baystrukov V, Kretov EI, Boukhris M et al. Keywords: mini-crush; T-provisional; bifurcation lesions

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - The optimal strategy to treat bifurcation lesions (BFLs) in a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) remains unknown.


AIMS - We sought to assess whether T-provisional or mini-crush is appropriate for BFLs within CTO vessels.


PATIENTS AND METHODS - From January 2011 to December 2013, patients who underwent successful CTO guidewire crossing and with a BFL within the CTO target vessel were enrolled prospectively and assigned randomly to either T-provisional stenting or the mini-crush technique for BFL treatment. One-year clinical follow-up was performed. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke.


RESULTS - The prevalence of BFLs was 54.3%. A total of 146 patients with BFLs within CTO vessel were enrolled prospectively and assigned randomly to either T-provisional stenting (N=73) or the mini-crush technique (N=73). Angiographic and clinical success rates were similar in the two groups: 91.8 versus 97.2% (P=0.27) and 91.8 versus 94.5% (P=0.67), respectively.Although T-provisional stenting was associated with a nonsignificantly lower incidence of MACCE in case of BFLs located far from the CTO (9.3 vs. 22.2%; P=0.426), the mini-crush technique resulted in higher MACCE-free survival at 1 year in the presence of BFLs within the CTO body or close to the proximal or the distal cap (89.1 vs. 64.9%; P=0.007).


CONCLUSION - The mini-crush technique appeared to be associated with improved 1-year clinical and angiographic outcomes, particularly when used to treat BFLs located within the CTO body or close to the proximal or the distal cap.