CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

分叉支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial Validation of bifurcation DEFINITION criteria and comparison of stenting strategies in true left main bifurcation lesions Classification and treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: putting the Medina classification to the test Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study ‘Small bifurcation?’ CT myocardial mass volume measurements change therapeutic strategy in coronary artery disease One Versus 2-stent Strategy for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions in the Context of a Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Multicenter Registry T and small protrusion (TAP) vs double kissing crush technique: Insights from in-vitro models Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Bifurcation Coronary Lesions.The 15th Consensus Document from the European Bifurcation Club
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>|

Clinical TrialSeptember 2019

JOURNAL：JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Three-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

X Chen, XB Li, the DKCRUSH-V Investigators. Keywords: left main bifurcation lesions; double kissing crush vs provisional stenting; target lesion failure; 3 year outcome

FULL TEXT PDF

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top