CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

分叉支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial Validation of bifurcation DEFINITION criteria and comparison of stenting strategies in true left main bifurcation lesions Classification and treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: putting the Medina classification to the test ‘Small bifurcation?’ CT myocardial mass volume measurements change therapeutic strategy in coronary artery disease Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study One Versus 2-stent Strategy for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions in the Context of a Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Multicenter Registry T and small protrusion (TAP) vs double kissing crush technique: Insights from in-vitro models Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Bifurcation Coronary Lesions.The 15th Consensus Document from the European Bifurcation Club
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>|

Original Research26 June 2020

JOURNAL：Eur Heart J. Article Link

Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial

JJ Zhang, F Ye, Kai Xu et al. Keywords: coronary bifurcation lesions; two-stent technique vs. provisional stenting; two-stent strategy; target lesion failure; stent thrombosis

Full Text PDF

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top