CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

分叉支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Difference in basic concept of coronary bifurcation intervention between Korea and Japan. Insight from questionnaire in experts of Korean and Japanese bifurcation clubs Anatomical Attributes of Clinically Relevant Diagonal Branches in Patients with Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions Asia Pacific Consensus Document on Coronary Bifurcation Interventions Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study Bench testing and coronary artery bifurcations: a consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients Optimal Strategy for Provisional Side Branch Intervention in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: 3-Year Outcomes of the SMART-STRATEGY Randomized Trial

Clinical Trial2021 Jan 16;S0002-8703(21)00015-6.

JOURNAL:Am Heart J. Article Link

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound-guided with angiography-guided double kissing crush stenting for patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: rationale and design of a prospective, randomized and multicenter DKCRUSH VIII trial

Z Ge, JJ Zhang, SL Chen et al. Keywords: DK crush; bifurcation lesions; IVUS

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Double kissing (DK) crush approach for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, particularly localized at distal left main or lesions with increased complexity, is associated with significant reduction in clinical events when compared with provisional stenting (PS). Recently, randomized clinical trial has demonstrated the net clinical benefits by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) in all-comers. However, the improvement in clinical outcome after DK crush treatment guided by IVUS over angiography-guidance for patients with complex bifurcation lesions have never been studied in a randomized fashion.

 

TRIAL DESIGN - DKCRUSH VIII study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess superiority of IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided DK crush stenting in patients with complex bifurcation lesions according to DEFINITION criteria. A total of 556 patients with complex bifurcation lesions will be randomly (1:1 of ratio) assigned to IVUS-guided or angiography-guided DK crush stenting group. The primary endpoint is the rate of 12-month target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR). The secondary endpoints consist of the individual component of primary endpoint, all-cause death, MI, and in-stent restenosis. The safety endpoint is the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. An angiographic follow-up will be performed for all patients at 13 months and clinical follow-up will be continued annually until 3 years after the index procedure.

 

CONCLUSION - DKCRUSH VIII trial is the first study designed to evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between IVUS-guided and angiography-guided DK crush stenting in patients with complex true bifurcation lesions. This study will also provide IVUS-derived criteria to define optimal DK crush stenting for bifurcation lesions at higher complexity.