CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Bifurcation Stenting

Abstract

Recommended Article

The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN) ‘Small bifurcation?’ CT myocardial mass volume measurements change therapeutic strategy in coronary artery disease Incidence of Adverse Events at 3 Months Versus at 12 Months After Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation in Patients Treated With Thin Stents With Unprotected Left Main or Coronary Bifurcations Effect of Side Branch Predilation in Coronary Bifurcation Stenting With the Provisional Approach - Results From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) II Registry T and small protrusion (TAP) vs double kissing crush technique: Insights from in-vitro models Double-Kissing Culotte Technique for Coronary Bifurcation Stenting - Technical evaluation and comparison with conventional double stenting techniques In vitro flow and optical coherence tomography comparison of two bailout techniques after failed provisional stenting for bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions Effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the geometry of coronary bifurcation lesions and clinical outcomes of coronary interventions in the J-REVERSE registry

Clinical Case Study2018 Feb 2;13(15):e1812-e1813.

JOURNAL:EuroIntervention. Article Link

Influence of the sequence of proximal optimisation technique and side branch dilation for the opening of jailed struts after coronary bifurcation stenting

Murasato Y, Mori T, Okamura T et al. Keywords: proximal optimisation technique; side branch dilation; jailed struts; coronary bifurcation stenting

ABSTRACT


A 67-year-old man with a 1,1,0 lesion in the left circumflex artery obtuse marginal branch bifurcation (Panel Aa), in which vessel references in the proximal, distal MV and SB were 3.2, 2.6, and 2.8 mm, respectively, underwent zotarolimus-eluting 2.75×12 mm stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) implantation at 8 atm (Panel Ab). POT was performed with the stent delivery balloon at 12 atm with its distal marker located in the carina to ensure that the stent was well apposed (Panel Ac). A 2.5×4 mm Glider PTCA balloon (TriReme, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was subsequently dilated in the SB ostium (Panel Ad). The procedure was guided with two-dimensional (2D) OCT (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and the data were sent to another hospital for 3D reconstruction using dedicated software (INTAGE Realia; CYBERNET, Tokyo, Japan). The 3D image demonstrated GWR into the proximal cell (Panel Ba); however, the protruded struts were folded towards the distal SB after SB dilation (Panel Bb-Bd, Moving image 1, Moving image 2).