CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

二尖瓣/三尖瓣瓣膜

Abstract

Recommended Article

New Evidence Supporting a Novel Conceptual Framework for Distinguishing Proportionate and Disproportionate Functional Mitral Regurgitation Adaptive development of concomitant secondary mitral and tricuspid regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Outcomes at 2 years Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: The Randomized MITHRAS Trial Association Between Malignant Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Review Initial experience with percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with cardiac amyloidosis The Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion to Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure Index: Association With All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Moderate or Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Patient and Hospital Characteristics of Mitral Valve Surgery in the United States

Original Research25 May 2021

JOURNAL:Eurointervention. Article Link

Incidence and Standardized Definitions of Mitral Valve Leaflet Adverse Events After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: the EXPAND Study

FM Asch, SH Little, GB Mackensen et al. Keywords: mitral valve leaflet adverse events; LAE; definition; MitraClip;

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - An independent panel of experts reviewed all investigator-reported cases of mitral valve leaflet adverse events (LAE) after MitraClipTM NTR/XTR in the EXPAND Study.

 

AIMS - We aimed to report the findings of the expert panel and standardize definitions for LAE.   

 

METHODS - Standard definitions for different types of LAE were formulated and events adjudicated after detailed review by the expert panel.

 

RESULTS - Enrolling centers reported LAE in 35 cases, 11 leaflet injuries (9 tear, 2 perforation) and 24 single leaflet device attachment (SLDA). The panel confirmed LAE in 20 cases (2.0% incidence), 18 patients had SLDA and 4 had leaflet injury (2 cases had both SLDA and injury). Leaflet injury occurred during device implant and resulted in surgical valve replacement or death. SLDA-alone events were identified during implant (n=2), pre-discharge (7) or at 30 days of follow-up (7) and were resolved (£ 2+ residual MR) with additional clips in 75% of cases.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Mitral valve repair with MitraClipTM NTR/XTR is safe. The rate of LAE is lower than previously reported using older generation devices. The proposed definitions and findings will help differentiate leaflet injury from inadequate leaflet insertion and SLDA, and provide guidance to consistently diagnose LAE post MitraClipTM.