CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Mitral/Tricuspid Valvular Disease

Abstract

Recommended Article

The management of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure: a joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC Mitral Valve Remodeling and Strain in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Primary Regurgitation and Normal Valves Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: From COAPT Trial Novel Transcatheter Mitral Valve Prosthesis for Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification Transcatheter Interventions for Tricuspid Valve Disease: What to Do and Who to Do it On Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Outcomes at 2 years Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses: MITRAL Trial Valve-in-Valve Arm 1-Year Outcomes 3-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Heart Failure

Original Research2020 Nov 22;ehaa819.

JOURNAL:Eur Heart J. Article Link

Prognostic importance of the transmitral pressure gradient in mitral annular calcification with associated mitral valve dysfunction

PB Bertrand, TW Churchill, E Yucel et al. Keywords: mitral annular calcification-related mitral valve dysfunction; mean transmitral pressure gradient; mitral regurgitation

ABSTRACT


AIMS - The aim of this study was to define the natural history of patients with mitral annular calcification (MAC)-related mitral valve dysfunction and to assess the prognostic importance of mean transmitral pressure gradient (MG) and impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR).

 

METHODS AND RESULTS - The institutional echocardiography database was examined from 2001 to 2019 for all patients with MAC and MG 3 mmHg. A total of 5754 patients were stratified by MG in low (35 mmHg, n = 3927), mid (510 mmHg, n = 1476), and high (10 mmHg, n = 351) gradient. The mean age was 78 ± 11 years, and 67% were female. MR was none/trace in 32%, mild in 42%, moderate in 23%, and severe in 3%. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and outcome models were adjusted for age, sex, and MAC-related risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease). Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 77%, 42%, and 18% in the low-gradient group; 73%, 38%, and 17% in the mid-gradient group; and 67%, 25%, and 11% in the high-gradient group, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001 between groups). MG was independently associated with mortality (adjusted HR 1.064 per 1 mmHg increase, 95% CI 1.0491.080). MR severity was associated with mortality at low gradients (P < 0.001) but not at higher gradients (P = 0.166 and 0.372 in the mid- and high-gradient groups, respectively).

 

CONCLUSION - In MAC-related mitral valve dysfunction, mean transmitral gradient is associated with increased mortality after adjustment for age, sex, and MAC-related risk factors. Concomitant MR is associated with excess mortality in low-gradient ranges (35 mmHg) but gradually loses prognostic importance at higher gradients, indicating prognostic utility of transmitral gradient in MAC regardless of MR severity.