CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract

Recommended Article

Combining IVUS and Optical Coherence Tomography for More Accurate Coronary Cap Thickness Quantification and Stress/Strain Calculations: A Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling Approach Early Strut Coverage in Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Stents and its Implications for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Randomized Trial Assessment and Quantitation of Stent Results by Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography Characteristics of abnormal post-stent optical coherence tomography findings in hemodialysis patients Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study Optimal threshold of postintervention minimum stent area to predict in-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: An optical coherence tomography analysis Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Pathophysiological Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Randomized comparison of stent strut coverage following angiography- or optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention

Original Research21 June 2019

JOURNAL:Eur Heart J. Article Link

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population

Dreyer RP, Tavella R, Curtis JP et al. Keywords: myocardial infarction; nonobstructive coronary arteries; MINOCA; MICAD; MACE

ABSTRACT


AIMS - The prognosis of patients with MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries) is poorly understood. We examined major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or stroke 12-months post-AMI in patients with MINOCA versus AMI patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD).

 

METHODS AND RESULTS - Multicentre, observational cohort study of patients with AMI (65 years) from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry (July 2009December 2013) who underwent coronary angiography with linkage to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) claims data. Patients were classified as MICAD or MINOCA by the presence or absence of an epicardial vessel with 50% stenosis. The primary endpoint was MACE at 12 months, and secondary endpoints included the components of MACE over 12 months. Among 286 780 AMI admissions (276 522 unique patients), 16 849 (5.9%) had MINOCA. The 12-month rates of MACE (18.7% vs. 27.6%), mortality (12.3% vs. 16.7%), and re-hospitalization for AMI (1.3% vs. 6.1%) and HF (5.9% vs. 9.3%) were significantly lower for MINOCA vs. MICAD patients (P < 0.001), but was similar between MINOCA and MICAD patients for re-hospitalization for stroke (1.6% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.128). Following risk-adjustment, MINOCA patients had a 43% lower risk of MACE over 12 months (hazard ratio = 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.550.59), in comparison to MICAD patients. This pattern was similar for adjusted risks of the MACE components.

 

CONCLUSION - This study confirms an unfavourable prognosis in elderly patients with MINOCA undergoing coronary angiography, with one in five patients with MINOCA suffering a major adverse event over 12 months.