CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

药物涂层球囊

Abstract

Recommended Article

Treatment strategies for coronary in-stent restenosis: systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian network meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials and 4880 patients Therapeutic Options for In-Stent Restenosis Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial Comparative efficacy of two paclitaxel-coated balloons with different excipient coatings in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: A pooled analysis of the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Optimizing Treatment of Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis 3 and 4 trials Therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon for de novo coronary lesions with diameters larger than 2.8 mm Prospective, large-scale multicenter trial for the use of drug-coated balloons in coronary lesions: The DCB-only All-Comers Registry Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study

Original Research2021 Dec 30.

JOURNAL:Eur J Heart Fail. Article Link

A population-based study of 92 clinically recognised risk factors for heart failure: co-occurrence, prognosis and preventive potential

A Banerjee, L Pasea, S-C Chung et al. Keywords: HF; risk factors

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Primary prevention strategies for heart failure(HF) have had limited success, possibly due to a wide range of underlying risk factors(RFs). Systematic evaluations of the prognostic burden and preventive potential across this wide range of risk factors are lacking.

 

OBJECTIVE - To estimate evidence, prevalence and co-occurrence for primary prevention and impact on prognosis of RFs for incident HF.

 

METHODS - We systematically reviewed trials and observational evidence of primary HF prevention across 92 putative aetiologic RFs for HF identified from US and European clinical practice guidelines. We identified 170 885 individuals aged 30 years with incident HF from 1997-2017, using linked primary and secondary care UK electronic health records(EHR) and rule-based phenotypes(ICD-10, Read Version 2, OPCS-4 procedure and medication codes) for each of 92 RFs.

 

RESULTS - Only 10/92 factors had high quality observational evidence for association with incident HF; 7 had effective RCT-based interventions for HF prevention(RCT-HF), and 6 for CVD prevention, but not HF(RCT-CVD), and the remainder had no RCT-based preventive interventions(RCT-0). We were able to map 91/92 risk factors to EHR using 5961 terms, and 88/91 factors were represented by at least one patient. In the 5 years prior to HF diagnosis, 44.3% had 4 RFs. By RCT evidence, the most common RCT-HF RFs were hypertension(48.5%), stable angina(34.9%), unstable angina(16.8%), myocardial infarction(15.8%), and diabetes(15.1%); RCT-CVD RFs were smoking(46.4%) and obesity(29.9%); and RCT-0 RFs were atrial arrhythmias(17.2%), cancer(16.5%),), heavy alcohol intake(14.9%). Mortality at 1 year varied across all 91 factors(lowest: pregnancy-related hormonal disorder 4.2%; highest: phaeochromocytoma 73.7%). Among new HF cases, 28.5% had no RCT-HF RFs and 38.6% had no RCT-CVD RFs. 15.6% had either no RF or only RCT-0 RFs.

 

CONCLUSIONS - 1 in 6 individuals with HF have no recorded RFs or RFs without trials. We provide a systematic map of primary preventive opportunities across a wide range of RFs for HF, demonstrating a high burden of co-occurrence and the need for trials tackling multiple RFs.