CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血流储备分数

Abstract

Recommended Article

The Impact of Coronary Physiology on Contemporary Clinical Decision Making Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Physiological Stratification of Patients With Angina Due to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Prognostic Implications of Plaque Characteristics and Stenosis Severity in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI) Utilization and Outcomes of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease The impact of downstream coronary stenoses on fractional flow reserve assessment of intermediate left main disease Fractional flow reserve in clinical practice: from wire-based invasive measurement to image-based computation

Clinical Trial2018 Jul 19.[Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Circulation. Article Link

Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction - The Randomized SHOCK-COOL Trial

Fuernau G, Beck J, Thiele H et al. Keywords: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Acute Heart Failure, Interventions and ACS

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Experimental trials suggest improved outcome by mild therapeutic hypothermia for cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to investigate hemodynamic effects of mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.


METHODS - Patients (n=40) with cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention without classical indication for mild therapeutic hypothermia underwent randomization in a 1:1 fashion to mild therapeutic hypothermia for 24 h or control. The primary endpoint was cardiac power index at 24 h; secondary endpoints included other hemodynamic parameters as well as serial measurements of arterial lactate.


RESULTS - No relevant differences were observed for the primary endpoint cardiac power index at 24 h (mild therapeutic hypothermia vs. control: 0.41 [interquartile range 0.31-0.52] vs. 0.36 [inter-quartile range 0.31-0.48] W/m2; p=0.50, median difference -0.025 [95% confidence interval -0.12 to 0.06 W/m2]). Similarly, all other hemodynamic measurements were not statistically different. Arterial lactate levels at 6, 8 and 10 hours were significantly higher in patients in the MTH group with a slower decline (p for interaction 0.03). There were no differences in 30-day mortality: (60 vs. 50%, hazard ratio 1.27 [95% confidence interval 0.55-2.94]; p=0.55).


CONCLUSIONS - In this randomized trial mild therapeutic hypothermia failed to show a substantial beneficial effect in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction on cardiac power index at 24 h.


CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION - URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01890317.