CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血流储备分数

Abstract

Recommended Article

Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography Individual Lesion-Level Meta-Analysis Comparing Various Doses of Intracoronary Bolus Injection of Adenosine With Intravenous Administration of Adenosine for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI Robustness of Fractional Flow Reserve for Lesion Assessment in Non-Infarct-Related Arteries of Patients With Myocardial Infarction Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Meta-Analysis of Death and Myocardial Infarction in the DEFINE-FLAIR and iFR-SWEDEHEART Trials Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Original Research2018 Oct 22;11(20):2058-2068.

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Optical Coherence Tomography–Defined Plaque Vulnerability in Relation to Functional Stenosis Severity and Microvascular Dysfunction

Usui E, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T et al. Keywords: coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; microvascular dysfunction; optical coherence tomography; stenosis severity

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - This study sought to investigate the relationship of unstable plaque features with physiological lesion severity and microvascular dysfunction.


BACKGROUND - The functional severity of epicardial lesions and microvascular dysfunction are both related to adverse clinical outcomes.


METHODS - We investigated 382 de novo intermediate and severe coronary lesions in 340 patients who underwent optical coherence tomography, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) examinations. Lesions were divided into tertiles based on either FFR or IMR values. The optical coherence tomography findings were compared among the tertiles of FFR and IMR. Each tertile was defined as follows: FFR-T1 (FFR <0.74), FFR-T2 (0.74 FFR 0.81), and FFR-T3 (FFR >0.81); and IMR-T1 (IMR 25), IMR-T2 (15 < IMR <25), and IMR-T3 (IMR 15).


RESULTS - No significant relationship was observed between FFR and IMR. The prevalence of optical coherence tomography-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was significantly greater in IMR-T1 than in IMR-T2 and IMR-T3. An overall significant difference in the prevalence of TCFAs was detected among FFR tertiles, although no pairwise comparison revealed statistical significance. The prevalence of ruptured plaque was significantly greater in IMR-T1 than in IMR-T2 and IMR-T3, although no significant difference was observed between FFR tertiles. Multivariate analysis showed that FFR and IMR were independent predictors of the prevalence of TCFAs (odds ratio: 0.036; 95% confidence interval: 0.004 to 0342; p = 0.004; and odds ratio: 1.034; 95% confidence interval: 1.014 to 1.054; p = 0.001, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS - Lower FFR and higher IMR values were independent predictors of the presence of a TCFA in angiographically intermediate-to-severe stable lesions or nonculprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome.

 

Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.