CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血流储备分数

Abstract

Recommended Article

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry Influence of Heart Rate on FFR Measurements: An Experimental and Clinical Validation Study

Clinical Trial2018 Jun;107(6):517-523.

JOURNAL:Clin Res Cardiol. Article Link

Revision: prognostic impact of baseline glucose levels in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock-a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial

Abdin A, Pöss J, Thiele H et al. Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; blood glucose; cardiogenic shock; hyperglycemia; prognosis

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Limited data from observational retrospective studies suggest an association between glucose levels and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of glucose at admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by CS included in the largest CS trial to date, the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.


METHODS AND RESULTS - In the IABP-SHOCK II-trial, patients with CS complicating AMI undergoing early revascularization were randomized to a therapy with vs. without IABP support. Primary and secondary endpoints were mortality within 30 days and 1 year, respectively. Glucose levels were examined at admission. Glucose levels were available in 513 patients. In total, 33.7% of the patients had known diabetes. Patients with diabetes had higher glucose levels compared to those without diabetes (median [interquartile range (IQR)] 13.1 mmol/L [IQR 9.5-18.3] vs. 10.8 mmol/L [IQR 7.8-15.4], p = 0.0003). Patients with glucose concentrations above the median (11.5 mmol/L) had higher 30-day and 1-year mortality compared to those below the median (47.7 vs. 36.5%, p = 0.004; 57.7 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.011, respectively). This negative prognostic impact of increased glucose levels remained significant in multivariate adjustment and was not influenced even after adjustment for the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus.


CONCLUSIONS - In patients with CS complicating AMI, increased glucose concentration at admission was an independent predictor for mortality at 30-days and 1-year, independently of the diabetic state.