CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血流储备分数

Abstract

Recommended Article

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation Influence of Heart Rate on FFR Measurements: An Experimental and Clinical Validation Study

Clinical Trial2020 Nov 16;S0735-1097(20)37802-5.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Strain-Guided Management of Potentially Cardiotoxic Cancer Therapy

P Thavendiranathan, T Negishi, SUCCOUR investigators et al. Keywords: cardio-protective therapy; cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction; global longitudinal strain heart failure

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - In patients at risk of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), initiation of cardio-protective therapy (CPT) is constrained by the low sensitivity of EF for minor changes in LV function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a robust and sensitive marker of LV dysfunction, but existing observational data have been insufficient to support a routine GLS-guided strategy for CPT.


OBJECTIVE - To identify whether GLS-guided CPT prevents reduction in LVEF in patients undergoing potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy, compared with usual care.


METHODS - In this international multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, 331 anthracycline-treated patients with another heart failure risk factor were randomly allocated to CPT initiation guided by either 12% relative reduction in GLS (n=166) or >10% absolute reduction of LVEF (n=165). Patients were followed for EF and development of CTRCD (symptomatic EF reduction >5% or >10% asymptomatic to <55%) over 1 year.


RESULTS - Of 331 randomized patients, 2 died and 22 withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up. Among 307 patients (age 54±12 years, 94% women, baseline LVEF 59±6%, GLS -20.6±2.4%) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 1.02 (0.98-1.07) years, most (n=278) had breast cancer. HF risk factors were prevalent: 29% had hypertension and 13% had diabetes mellitus. At 1-year follow-up, although the primary outcome of change in LVEF was not significantly different between the two arms, there was significantly greater use of CPT, and fewer patients met CTRCD criteria in the GLS-guided than the EF-guided arm (5.8% vs 13.7%, p=0.02), and 1-year EF was 57±6% versus 55±7% (p=0.05). Patients diagnosed with CTRCD in the EF-guided arm had a larger reduction in LVEF at follow-up than in the GLS-guided arm (9.1±10.9% versus 2.9±7.4%, p=0.03).


CONCLUSIONS - Although the change in LVEF was not different between the two arms, GLS-guided CPT significantly reduced a meaningful fall of LVEF to the abnormal range. The results support the use of GLS in surveillance for CTRCD.