CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血流储备分数

Abstract

Recommended Article

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation Influence of Heart Rate on FFR Measurements: An Experimental and Clinical Validation Study
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>|

Review Article2017 Dec;29(12):E167-E176.

JOURNAL：J Invasive Cardiol. Article Link

A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Lesion Modification Strategies During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 244,795 Patients From 22 Studies

Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Brilakis ES et al. Keywords: atherectomy, plaque modification, drug-eluting stents, meta-analysis

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - Outcomes with use of lesion-modification strategies in the drug-eluting stent era have received limited study.


METHODS - We conducted a meta-analysis of 22 studies published between 2004-2016 reporting outcomes after use of rotational atherectomy, cutting-balloon, and scoring-balloon angioplasty.


RESULTS - In observational trials, acute luminal gain was higher after lesion modification as compared with control (standardized mean difference, 0.23 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.44; P=.04), with no difference in acute gain in randomized studies. Compared with control, lesion modification was associated with lower restenosis in randomized trials (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90; P=.01). Ninety-day incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was higher after lesion modification in observational studies (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.83; P=.02), but similar in randomized trials. Ninety-day incidence of target-lesion or target-vessel revascularization (TLR-TVR) and myocardial infarction (MI) was similar. Ninety-day incidence of death was higher after lesion modification in observational studies (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.95; P=.03), but similar in randomized trials. At 1 year, the MACE rate was similar for lesion modification compared with control in observational studies, but lower after lesion modification in randomized trials (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88; P<.01). TLR-TVR was higher with lesion modification in observational studies, but lower in randomized trials (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88; P<.01).


CONCLUSIONS - While observational studies suggest a higher early MACE rate and more restenosis, randomized trials show similar short-term and improved long-term outcomes with pre-stenting lesion modification compared with control.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top