CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Bifurcation Stenting

Abstract

Recommended Article

Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions Evolution of the Crush Technique for Bifurcation Stenting Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Final Kissing Ballooning in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With the 1-Stent Technique: Results From the COBIS II Registry (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry) T and small protrusion (TAP) vs double kissing crush technique: Insights from in-vitro models Treating Bifurcation Lesions: The Result Overcomes the Technique
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>|

Review Article2018 Aug;13(1):64-69.

JOURNAL：Eur Cardiol. Article Link

Cardio-oncology: A Focus on Cardiotoxicity

Koutsoukis A, Ntalianis A, Repasos E et al. Keywords: Adverse effects; cancer; cardio-oncology; chemotherapy; chemotherapy-associated cardiotoxicity

FULL TEXT PDF

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top