CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Bifurcation Stenting

Abstract

Recommended Article

Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study Step-by-step manual for planning and performing bifurcation PCI: a resource-tailored approach Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions Evolution of the Crush Technique for Bifurcation Stenting Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Final Kissing Ballooning in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With the 1-Stent Technique: Results From the COBIS II Registry (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry) Effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the geometry of coronary bifurcation lesions and clinical outcomes of coronary interventions in the J-REVERSE registry T and small protrusion (TAP) vs double kissing crush technique: Insights from in-vitro models
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>|

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 9, May 2019

JOURNAL：JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Validation of High-Risk Features for Stent-Related Ischemic Events as Endorsed by the 2017 DAPT Guidelines

Y Ueki, A Karagiannis, C Zanchin et al. Keywords: stent-related ischemic event; high-risk feature; DOCE

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - This study sought to validate European Society of Cardiology guideline-endorsed high-risk features of stent-related recurrent ischemic events for the prediction of ischemic and bleeding outcomes including a stratification according to the PRECISE-DAPT score estimated bleeding risk.


BACKGROUND - The 2017 European Society of Cardiology–focused update on dual-antiplatelet therapy endorsed high-risk features of stent-related recurrent ischemic events. Because patients with high ischemic risk also have an increased bleeding risk, appropriate risk stratification for ischemic and bleeding events is crucial.


METHODS - Between January 2009 and December 2015, a total of 10,236 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively included in the Bern PCI Registry. Guideline-endorsed high-risk features were retrospectively assessed. The primary ischemic endpoint was device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) at 1 year, and the primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3–5 at 1 year.



RESULTS - A total of 5,323 (52.0%) patients had at least 1 high-risk feature. Among patients with high-risk features, DOCE (12.3% vs. 5.5%; p < 0.001) and BARC 3–5 bleeding (4.9% vs. 2.2%; p < 0.001) occurred more frequently compared with those without. There was a graded risk increase for DOCE (0: 5.5%; 1 to 2: 11.3%; and ≥3: 16.7%; p < 0.001) and BARC 3–5 bleeding (0: 2.2%; 1 to 2: 4.5%; and ≥3: 6.6%; p < 0.001) as the number of high-risk features increased. High-PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25) was associated with an increased risk of DOCE and BARC 3–5 bleeding, irrespective of number of high-risk features.


CONCLUSIONS - The European Society of Cardiology guideline-endorsed high-risk features were associated with increased ischemic and bleeding risks following percutaneous coronary intervention in routine clinical practice. (CARDIOBASE Bern PCI Registry; NCT02241291)

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top