CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Mitral/Tricuspid Valvular Disease

Abstract

Recommended Article

Surgery Does Not Improve Survival in Patients With Isolated Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Regurgitant Volume/Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Ratio: Prognostic Value in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation A Score to Assess Mortality After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair Impact of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair on Preprocedural and Postprocedural Hospitalization Rates Potential Candidates for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Predictors and Prognosis Prevalence and clinical implications of valvular calcification on coronary computed tomography angiography Thrombotic Risk and Antithrombotic Strategies After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Pathophysiology, diagnosis and new therapeutic approaches for ischemic mitral regurgitation

Clinical TrialVolume 12, Issue 20, October 2019

JOURNAL:JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions Article Link

Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study

A Jeremias, JE Davies, A Maehara et al. Keywords: coronary physiology; ischemia; PCI

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - This study sought to evaluate the incidence and causes of an abnormal instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) after angiographically successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).


BACKGROUND -  Impaired coronary physiology as assessed by fractional flow reserve is present in some patients after PCI and is prognostically relevant.


METHODS - DEFINE PCI (Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study in which a blinded iFR pull back was performed after angiographically successful PCI in 562 vessels in 500 patients. Inclusion criteria were angina with either multivessel or multilesion coronary artery disease with an abnormal baseline iFR. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of residual ischemia after operator-assessed angiographically successful PCI, defined as an iFR <0.90. The causes of impaired iFR were categorized as stent related, untreated proximal or distal focal stenosis, or diffuse atherosclerosis.


RESULTS - An average of 1.1 vessels per patient had abnormal baseline iFRs, with a mean value of 0.69 ± 0.22, which improved to 0.93 ± 0.07 post-PCI. Residual ischemia after angiographically successful PCI was present in 112 patients (24.0%), with a mean iFR in that population of 0.84 ± 0.06 (range 0.60 to 0.89). Among patients with impaired post-PCI iFRs, 81.6% had untreated focal stenoses that were angiographically inapparent, and 18.4% had diffuse disease. Among the focal lesions, 38.4% were located within the stent segment, while 31.5% were proximal and 30.1% were distal to the stent. Post-PCI vessel angiographic diameter stenosis was not a predictor of impaired post-procedural iFR.


CONCLUSIONS - Blinded post-PCI physiological assessment detected residual ischemia in nearly 1 in 4 patients after coronary stenting despite an operator-determined angiographically successful result. Most cases of residual ischemia were due to inapparent focal lesions potentially amenable to treatment with additional PCI. (Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI [DEFINE PCI]; NCT03084367)