CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

分叉支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Feasibility and efficacy of the ultrashort side branch dedicated balloon in coronary bifurcation stenting Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study Tips of the dual-lumen microcatheter-facilitated reverse wire technique in percutaneous coronary interventions for markedly angulated bifurcated lesions Anatomical Attributes of Clinically Relevant Diagonal Branches in Patients with Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions Asia Pacific Consensus Document on Coronary Bifurcation Interventions Difference in basic concept of coronary bifurcation intervention between Korea and Japan. Insight from questionnaire in experts of Korean and Japanese bifurcation clubs Bench testing and coronary artery bifurcations: a consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies

ConsensusOctober 2020

JOURNAL:Eurointervention. Article Link

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Bifurcation Coronary Lesions.The 15th Consensus Document from the European Bifurcation Club

F Burzotta; JF Lassen; T Lefèvre et al. Keywords: EBC; consensus; bifurcation stenting

ABSTRACT

The 15th European Bifurcation Club (EBC) meeting was held in Barcelona in October 2019 and it facilitated a renewed consensus on coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) and unprotected left main (LM) percutaneous interventions.


Bifurcation stenting techniques continue to be refined, developed and tested. It remains evident that provisional approach with optional side-branch treatment utilising T, T and small protrusion (TAP) or culotte continue to provide flexible options for the majority of CBL patients. Debate persists regarding the optimal treatment of side branches, including assessment of clinical significance and thresholds for bail-out treatment. In more complex CBL, especially when involving the LM, adoption of dedicated 2-stent techniques should be considered. Operators using such techniques have to be fully familiar with their procedural steps and should acknowledge associated limitations and challenges. When using 2-stent techniques, failure to perform a final kissing inflation is regarded as a technical failure, since it may jeopardize clinical outcome.


The development of novel technical tools and drug regimens deserve attention. In particular, intra-coronary imaging, bifurcation simulation, drug-eluting balloon technology and tailored anti-platelet therapy are identified as promising tools to enhance clinical outcomes.


In conclusion, the evolution of a broad spectrum of bifurcation PCI components have resulted from studies extending from bench testing to randomised controlled trials. However, further advances are still needed to achieve the ambitious goal of optimizing the clinical outcomes for every patient undergoing PCI on a CBL.