CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

经皮左心耳封堵

科研文章

荐读文献

Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Non-Warfarin Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: 4-Year Outcomes of PRAGUE-17 Management and outcomes of patients with left atrial appendage thrombus prior to percutaneous closure Rivaroxaban Is Associated With Higher Rates of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Than Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Nationwide Propensity Score–Weighted Study Stretch-induced sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium leak is causatively associated with atrial fibrillation in pressure-overloaded hearts Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Results From the CABANA Trial Half-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Standard Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Clinical Impact of Residual Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry
|<< 1 2 3 4 >>|

Original Research20 July 2021

JOURNAL:Ann Intern Med. Article Link

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study

DH Kim, A Pawar, JJ Gagne et al. Keywords: DOACs vs. warfarin; AF; dabigatran; rivaroxaban; apixaban

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - The role of differing levels of frailty in the choice of oral anticoagulants for older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.


OBJECTIVE - To examine the outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin by frailty levels.


DESIGN - 1:1 propensity scorematched analysis of Medicare data, 2010 to 2017.


SETTING - Community.


PATIENTS - Medicare beneficiaries with AF who initiated use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin.


MEASUREMENTS - Composite end point of death, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding by frailty levels, defined by a claims-based frailty index.


RESULTS - In the dabigatranwarfarin cohort (n = 158 730; median follow-up, 72 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 63.5 for dabigatran initiators and 65.6 for warfarin initiators (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.05]; rate difference [RD], 2.2 [CI, 6.5 to 2.1]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.81 (CI, 0.68 to 0.97), 0.98 (CI, 0.90 to 1.08), and 1.09 (CI, 0.96 to 1.23), respectively. In the rivaroxabanwarfarin cohort (n = 275 944; median follow-up, 82 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 77.8 for rivaroxaban initiators and 83.7 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.94 to 1.02]; RD, 5.9 [CI, 9.4 to 2.4]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.88 (CI, 0.77 to 0.99), 1.04 (CI, 0.98 to 1.10), and 0.96 (CI, 0.89 to 1.04), respectively. In the apixabanwarfarin cohort (n = 218 738; median follow-up, 84 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 60.1 for apixaban initiators and 92.3 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.65 to 0.72]; RD, 32.2 [CI, 36.1 to 28.3]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.61 (CI, 0.52 to 0.71), 0.66 (CI, 0.61 to 0.70), and 0.73 (CI, 0.67 to 0.80), respectively.


LIMITATIONS - Residual confounding and lack of clinical frailty assessment.


CONCLUSION - For older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with lower rates of adverse events across all frailty levels. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower event rates only among nonfrail patients.