CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Other Relevant Articles

Abstract

Recommended Article

Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Biological Phenotypes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmissions Where Are the Solutions? Association of preoperative glucose concentration with myocardial injury and death after non-cardiac surgery (GlucoVISION): a prospective cohort study The year in cardiovascular medicine 2020: interventional cardiology Update in the Percutaneous Management of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Reappraisal of Reported Genes for Sudden Arrhythmic Death: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Gene Validity for Brugada Syndrome Can the Vanishing Stent Reappear? Fix the Technique, or Fix the Device?

Appropriateness Criteria2009 Feb 10;53(6):530-53.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: A Report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force et al. Keywords: American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force

Full Text PDF