CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Other Relevant Articles

Abstract

Recommended Article

Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2020: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials In-Hospital Costs and Costs of Complications of Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty Insights From the OPEN-CTO Registry Impact of lesion complexity on peri-procedural adverse events and the benefit of potent intravenous platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibition after percutaneous coronary intervention: core laboratory analysis from 10 854 patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial Improving the Design of Future PCI Trials for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Major trials in coronary intervention from 2018 The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research

Original Research2018 Jun;25(3):769-776.

JOURNAL:J Nucl Cardiol. Article Link

Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

Prejean SP, Din M, Reyes E et al. Keywords: Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; coronary artery disease; non-invasive imaging; stress testing

ABSTRACT


In this Guidelines in Review, we review side-by-side the recommendations provided by the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. We review the recommendations for imaging in the evaluation of patients with possible ACS followed by the diagnostic evaluation of patients with proven NSTE-ACS, based on their risk for adverse clinical events.