CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Other Relevant Articles

Abstract

Recommended Article

Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Biological Phenotypes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Association of preoperative glucose concentration with myocardial injury and death after non-cardiac surgery (GlucoVISION): a prospective cohort study Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmissions Where Are the Solutions? The year in cardiovascular medicine 2020: interventional cardiology Update in the Percutaneous Management of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Reappraisal of Reported Genes for Sudden Arrhythmic Death: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Gene Validity for Brugada Syndrome Can the Vanishing Stent Reappear? Fix the Technique, or Fix the Device?

Review Article2021 Feb, 14 (3) 237–246

JOURNAL:JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions Article Link

Invasive Coronary Physiology After Stent Implantation: Another Step Toward Precision Medicine

S Biscaglia , B Uretsky , E Barbato , C Collet et al. Keywords: intracoronary physiology; post PCI; functional assessment

ABSTRACT

Intracoronary physiology is routinely used in setting the indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but seldom in assessing procedural results. This attitude is increasingly challenged by accumulated evidence demonstrating the value of post-PCI functional assessment in predicting long-term patient outcomes. Besides fractional flow reserve, a number of new indexes recently incorporated to clinical practice, including nonhyperemic pressure and functional angiographic indexes, provide new opportunities for the physiological assessment of PCI results. Largely, the benefit of these tools is derived from longitudinal analysis of the treated vessel, which allows precise identification of the vessel segment accounting for a suboptimal functional result and enabling operators to perform accurate PCI optimization. In this document the authors review available evidence supporting why physiological assessment should be extended to immediate post-PCI with the aim of improving patient outcomes. A step-by-step guide on how available physiological tools can be used for such purpose is provided.