CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

IVUS Guidance

Abstract

Recommended Article

Mechanisms of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: intravascular ultrasound analysis Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial Intravascular ultrasound predictors for edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules A volumetric intravascular ultrasound comparison of early drug-eluting stent thrombosis versus restenosis Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the effects of rotational atherectomy in calcified coronary artery lesions Mechanical complications of everolimus-eluting stents associated with adverse events: an intravascular ultrasound study Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease

Review Article2017 Jan 20;12(13):1632-1642.

JOURNAL:EuroIntervention. Article Link

Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis

Nerlekar N, Cheshire CJ, Verma KP et al. Keywords: coronary angioplasty; intravascular ultrasound; percutaneous coronary intervention; drug-eluting stent; meta-analysis

ABSTRACT


AIMS - Our aim was to assess whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) improves clinical outcomes during implantation of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). IVUS guidance is associated with improved clinical outcomes during DES implantation, but it is unknown whether this benefit is limited to either first- or second-generation devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS - MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched for studies comparing outcomes between IVUS- and angiography-guided PCI. Among 909 potentially relevant studies, 15 trials met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as death, myocardial infarction, target vessel/lesion revascularisation (TVR/TLR) or stent thrombosis (ST). Summary estimates were obtained using Peto modelling. In total, 9,313 patients from six randomised trials and nine observational studies were included. First-generation DES were implanted in 6,156 patients (3,064IVUS-guided and 3,092 angiography-guided) and second-generation in 3,157 patients (1,528IVUS-guided and 1,629 angiography-guided). IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in MACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.85, p<0.001), across both first- (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, p=0.01) and second-generation DES (0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77, p<0.001). For second-generation DES, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac death (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.78, p=0.02), TVR (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, p=0.006), TLR (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.90, p=0.01) and ST (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.78, p=0.02). Cumulative meta-analysis highlighted progressive temporal benefit towards IVUS-guided PCI to reduce MACE (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS - IVUS guidance is associated with a significant reduction in MACE during implantation of both first- and second-generation DES platforms. These data support the use of IVUS guidance in contemporary revascularisation procedures using second-generation DES.