CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Comparison of inhospital mortality, length of hospitalization, costs, and vascular complications of percutaneous coronary interventions guided by ultrasound versus angiography Coronary plaque redistribution after stent implantation is determined by lipid composition: A NIRS-IVUS analysis Coronary plaque redistribution after stent implantation is determined by lipid composition: A NIRS-IVUS analysis IVUS in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned? The impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance during drug eluting stent implantation on angiographic outcomes Long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions with or without intracoronary pressure wire guidance or intracoronary ultrasonographic imaging: a large cohort study Novel predictors of late lumen enlargement in distal reference segments after successful recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusion Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation on Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Subgroup Analysis From ULTIMATE Trial

Clinical TrialAvailable online 15 November 2017

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients

Buccheri S, Franchina G, Capodanno D et al. Keywords: clinical outcomes; coronary angiography; intravascular ultrasound; optical coherence tomography; percutaneous coronary intervention

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - The authors sought to explore the comparative clinical efficacy of different imaging modalities for guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).


BACKGROUND - Coronary angiography (CA) is the standard imaging modality for intraprocedural guidance of PCI. Intracoronary imaging techniques, including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), can overcome some limitations of CA.


METHODS - Comprehensive hierarchical Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and adjusted observational studies comparing clinical outcomes of PCI with stent implantation guided by CA, IVUS, or OCT.


RESULTS - A total of 31 studies encompassing 17,882 patients were included. Compared with CA guidance, the risks of all-cause death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.58 to 0.98), myocardial infarction (OR: 0.72, 95% CrI: 0.52 to 0.93), target lesion revascularization (OR: 0.74, 95% CrI: 0.58 to 0.90) and stent thrombosis (OR: 0.42, 95% CrI: 0.20 to 0.72) were significantly reduced by IVUS guidance. PCI guidance using either IVUS or OCT was associated with a significant reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.67 to 0.91 and OR: 0.68, 95% CrI: 0.49 to 0.97, respectively) and cardiovascular death (OR: 0.47, 95% CrI: 0.32 to 0.66 and OR: 0.31, 95% CrI: 0.13 to 0.66, respectively). No differences in terms of comparative clinical efficacy were found between IVUS and OCT for all the investigated outcomes. Pooled estimates were consistent across several sensitivity analyses. However, the treatment effect of IVUS on all-cause death was neutralized in the analysis restricted to randomized clinical trials (OR: 1.03, 95% CrI: 0.41 to 2.14).


CONCLUSIONS - Compared with CA, the use of intravascular imaging techniques for PCI guidance reduces the risk of cardiovascular death and adverse events.


Click here to read the related editorial titled "Intravascular Imaging and Stent Implantation and the Elephant in the Room" by Gary S. Mintz.