CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Role of intravascular ultrasound in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention Mechanisms of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: intravascular ultrasound analysis Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance vs. Angiographic Guidance in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Long-Term Clinical Outcomes From the CREDO-Kyoto AMI Registry Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis The role of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound in characterizing bare metal and drug-eluting stent restenotic neointima as compared to optical coherence tomography Differential prognostic effect of intravascular ultrasound use according to implanted stent length Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study

Original ResearchVolume 74, Issue 13 Supplement, October 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation on Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Subgroup Analysis From ULTIMATE Trial

JJ Zhang, XF Gao, the ULTIMATE Investigators. Keywords: IVUS guidance vs angiography guidance; TVF; CKD

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) present more frequently with complex and extensive lesions, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)–guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with improved clinical outcomes in complex lesions. However, it still remains controversial that routine IVUS guidance could be beneficial to CKD patients.


METHODS - This study aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS- or angiography-guided DES implantation on patients with CKD based on the database from the ULTIMATE trial.


RESULTS - Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was available in 1,443 patients, with mean eGFR 81.41 ± 28.92 ml/min/1.73 m2, of whom 723 were in the IVUS guidance group and 720 in the angiography guidance group. Finally, CKD was present in 349 (24.2%) patients. At 12 months, the target vessel failure (TVF) in the CKD group was 7.2%, significantly higher than 3.2% in the no CKD group (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.38 to 3.84; p = 0.001), mainly driven by increased risk of cardiac death (2.9% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001) in CKD patients. Moreover, there were 25 TVFs in CKD patients, with 7 (3.9%) in the IVUS group and 18 (10.7%) in the angiography group (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.84; p = 0.01) (Figure), while 35 TVFs occurred in patients without CKD, with 14 (2.6%) in the IVUS group and 21 (3.8%) in the angiography group (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.32; p = 0.25; p for interaction = 0.24). The reduced risk of TVF in the IVUS group for CKD patients was mainly driven by the lower risk of TVMI (0.6% vs. 3.6%; borderline p = 0.05) and TVR (1.1% vs. 4.7; p = 0.04).


CONCLUSION - The present study demonstrated that CKD patients undergoing DES implantation had a higher risk of TVF during 12 months of follow-up. More importantly, the risk of TVF in CKD patients could be significantly decreased through IVUS guidance compared with angiography guidance.