CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Meta-analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries Imaging- and physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention without contrast administration in advanced renal failure: a feasibility, safety, and outcome study Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial) Results From the OPINION Imaging Study Attenuated plaque detected by intravascular ultrasound: clinical, angiographic, and morphologic features and post-percutaneous coronary intervention complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes Impact of plaque components on no-reflow phenomenon after stent deployment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis

Original ResearchVolume 74, Issue 13 Supplement, October 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation on Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Subgroup Analysis From ULTIMATE Trial

JJ Zhang, XF Gao, the ULTIMATE Investigators. Keywords: IVUS guidance vs angiography guidance; TVF; CKD

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) present more frequently with complex and extensive lesions, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)–guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with improved clinical outcomes in complex lesions. However, it still remains controversial that routine IVUS guidance could be beneficial to CKD patients.


METHODS - This study aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS- or angiography-guided DES implantation on patients with CKD based on the database from the ULTIMATE trial.


RESULTS - Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was available in 1,443 patients, with mean eGFR 81.41 ± 28.92 ml/min/1.73 m2, of whom 723 were in the IVUS guidance group and 720 in the angiography guidance group. Finally, CKD was present in 349 (24.2%) patients. At 12 months, the target vessel failure (TVF) in the CKD group was 7.2%, significantly higher than 3.2% in the no CKD group (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.38 to 3.84; p = 0.001), mainly driven by increased risk of cardiac death (2.9% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001) in CKD patients. Moreover, there were 25 TVFs in CKD patients, with 7 (3.9%) in the IVUS group and 18 (10.7%) in the angiography group (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.84; p = 0.01) (Figure), while 35 TVFs occurred in patients without CKD, with 14 (2.6%) in the IVUS group and 21 (3.8%) in the angiography group (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.32; p = 0.25; p for interaction = 0.24). The reduced risk of TVF in the IVUS group for CKD patients was mainly driven by the lower risk of TVMI (0.6% vs. 3.6%; borderline p = 0.05) and TVR (1.1% vs. 4.7; p = 0.04).


CONCLUSION - The present study demonstrated that CKD patients undergoing DES implantation had a higher risk of TVF during 12 months of follow-up. More importantly, the risk of TVF in CKD patients could be significantly decreased through IVUS guidance compared with angiography guidance.