CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Acute Coronary Syndrom

Abstract

Recommended Article

Elective Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Incidence, Determinants, and Outcome (From the CORONOR Study) Impact of Off-Hours Versus On-Hours Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Myocardial Damage and Clinical Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Relations between implementation of new treatments and improved outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry 1995 to 2014 Restenosis, Stent Thrombosis, and Bleeding Complications - Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis Chronic total occlusion intervention of the non-infarct-related artery in acute myocardial infarction patients: the Korean multicenter chronic total occlusion registry Precisely Tuned Inhibition of HIF Prolyl Hydroxylases Is Key for Cardioprotection After Ischemia Ticagrelor alone vs. ticagrelor plus aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: TWILIGHT-ACS Anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy in patients with left ventricular thrombus after first acute myocardial infarction

Clinical TrialJune 2017, Volume 6, Issue 6

JOURNAL:J Am Heart Assoc. Article Link

Quality of Care in Chinese Hospitals: Processes and Outcomes After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Downing NS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM et al. Keywords: China; hospital performance; quality improvement; quality measurement variation

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - China has gaps in the quality of care provided to patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but little is known about how quality varies between hospitals.


METHODS AND RESULTS - Using nationally representative data from the China PEACE-Retrospective AMI Study, we characterized the quality of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction at the hospital level and examined variation between hospitals. Two summary measures were used to describe the overall quality of care at each hospital and to characterize variations in quality between hospitals in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The composite rate measured the proportion of opportunities a hospital had to deliver 6 guideline-recommended treatments for ST-elevation myocardial infarction that were successfully met, while the defect-free rate measured the proportion of patients at each hospital receiving all guideline-recommended treatments for which they were eligible. Risk-standardized mortality rates were calculated. Our analysis included 12 108 patients treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction at 162 hospitals. The median composite rate increased from 56.8% (interquartile range [IQR], 45.9-72.0) in 2001 to 80.5% (IQR, 74.7-84.8) in 2011; however, substantial variation remained in 2011 with defect-free rates ranging from 0.0% to 76.9%. The median risk-standardized mortality rate increased from 9.9% (IQR, 9.1-11.7) in 2001 to 12.6% (IQR, 10.9-14.6) in 2006 before falling to 10.4% (IQR, 9.1-12.4) in 2011.


CONCLUSIONS - Higher rates of guideline-recommended care and a decline in variation between hospitals are indicative of an improvement in quality. Although some variation persisted in 2011, very top-performing hospitals missed few opportunities to provide guideline-recommended care. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on eliminating residual variation as well as measuring and improving outcomes.


CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION - URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01624883.

© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.