CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Acute Coronary Syndrom

Abstract

Recommended Article

Editor's Choice- Impact of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention on 1-year outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Results of the randomised IABP-SHOCK II trial Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Efficacy and Safety of Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction OPTIMAL USE OF LIPID-LOWERING THERAPY AFTER ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES: A Position Paper endorsed by the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP) MR-proADM as a Prognostic Marker in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction-DANAMI-3 (a Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients With STEMI) Substudy Canadian SCAD Cohort Study: Shedding Light on SCAD From a United Front Association of Acute Procedural Results with Long-term Outcomes After CTO-PCI Prognostic and Practical Validation of Current Definitions of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Original Research2019 Mar 12. pii: S0735-1097(19)33879-3.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with STEMI Treated with Fibrinolytic Therapy: TREAT Trial

Berwanger O, Lopes RD, Moia DDF et al. Keywords: ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy vs clopidogrel; efficacy; STEMI

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - The efficacy of ticagrelor in the long-term post ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain.


OBJECTIVES - To evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy.


METHODS - We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded endpoint adjudication trial that enrolled 3,799 patients (age < 75 years) with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy. Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-to-600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter The key outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the same composite outcome with the addition of severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events at 12 months.


RESULTS - The combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 129 of 1,913 patients (6.7%) receiving ticagrelor and in 137 of 1,886 patients (7.3%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio of 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.18; P=0.53). The composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events occurred in 153 of 1,913 patients (8.0%) treated with ticagrelor and in 171 of 1,886 patients (9.1%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio of 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.09; P=0.25). The rates of major, fatal, and intracranial bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups.


CONCLUSIONS - Among patients aged under 75 years with STEMI, administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy did not significantly reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel.

 

Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.