CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Acute Coronary Syndrom

Abstract

Recommended Article

Comparison in prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcome of VSR versus FWR after acute myocardial infarction: The prospective, multicenter registry MOODY trial-heart rupture analysis SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 Implications of Alternative Definitions of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Transition of Macrophages to Fibroblast-Like Cells in Healing Myocardial Infarction Considerations for Single-Measurement Risk-Stratification Strategies for Myocardial Infarction Using Cardiac Troponin Assays Complete Versus Culprit-Only Lesion Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
|<<... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ...>>|

Original Research2017 Aug 1;240:66-71.

JOURNAL：Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Effect of improved door-to-balloon time on clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Lee WC, Fang HY, Fang CY et al. Keywords: Door-to-balloon time; Prognostic factors; ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVE - Few studies have focused on the effects of an improved door-to-balloon time on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to explore the effect of improving door-to-balloon time on prognosis and to identify major predictors of mortality.

METHODS - From January 2005 to December 2014, 1751 patients experienced STEMI and received primary percutaneous intervention in our hospital. During a 10-year period, the patients were divided into two groups according to the time period. Since mid-2009, shortening door-to-balloon time has been an important concern of health care. As a result of targeted efforts, as of January 2010, door-to-balloon time shortened significantly. In our study, a total 853 patients were in group 1 during January 2005 to December 2009, and a total 898 patients were in group 2 during January 2010 to December 2014.


RESULTS - The incidence of major adverse cardiac cerebral events (26.7% vs. 23.2%; p=0.120), the incidence of cardiovascular mortality (9.3% vs. 8.8%; p=0.741), and the incidence of all-cause mortality (12.6% vs. 12.2%; p=0.798) were similar between the two groups. The incidence of target vessel revascularization significantly decreased in group 2 (17.8% vs. 12.6%; p=0.008). However, the incidence of stroke increased in group 2 (1.8% vs. 3.6%; p=0.034).


CONCLUSION - Improving door-to-balloon time could not improve 1-year cardiovascular mortality whether low-risk or high-risk patients. The improvement in the door-balloon time does not improve outcomes studied, probably because it is not accompanied by a reduction in total reperfusion time, which means from onset of symptoms to reperfusion.


Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top