CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Acute Coronary Syndrom

Abstract

Recommended Article

Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995-2014 Association Between Haptoglobin Phenotype and Microvascular Obstruction in Patients With STEMI: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial Clarification of Myocardial Infarction Types Timing of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Administration in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Dynamic Myocardial Ultrasound Localization Angiography Comparison in prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcome of VSR versus FWR after acute myocardial infarction: The prospective, multicenter registry MOODY trial-heart rupture analysis
|<<... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ...>>|

Original Research2016 Dec 1;224:72-78.

JOURNAL：Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Impact of door-to-balloon time on long-term mortality in high- and low-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Clark DJ; Melbourne Interventional Group. Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Door-to-balloon-time; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Risk assessment; STEMI

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Door-to-balloon time (DTBT) less than 90min remains the benchmark of timely reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The relative long-term benefit of timely reperfusion in STEMI patients with differing risk profiles is less certain. Thus, we aimed to assess the impact of DTBT on long-term mortality in high- and low-risk STEMI patients.


METHOD - We analysed baseline clinical and procedural characteristics of 2539 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry from 2004 to 2012. Patients were classified high risk (HR-STEMI) if they presented with cardiogenic shock, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or Killip class ≥2; or low-risk (LR-STEMI) if there were no high-risk features. We then stratified high- and low-risk patients by DTBT (≤90min vs. >90min) and assessed long-term mortality.


RESULT - Of the 2539 patients, 395 (16%) met the high-risk criteria. A DTBT ≤90min was achieved in 43% of HR-STEMI patients and in 55% of LR-STEMI patients. Patients in the HR-STEMI compared to LR-STEMI cohort had higher in-hospital (31% vs. 1%, p<0.01) and long-term mortality (37% vs. 7%, p<0.01). A DTBT ≤90min was associated with significant improvements in short- and long-term mortality in both groups. A DTBT ≤90min was an independent multivariate predictor of long-term survival in LR-STEMI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.9, p=0.02) but not in HR-STEMI (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.1, p=0.11).


CONCLUSION - A DTBT ≤90min was associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes in high- and low-risk STEMI patients. However, it was only an independent predictor of long-term survival in LR-STEMI patients.


Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top