CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

急性冠脉综合征

Abstract

Recommended Article

No causal effects of plasma homocysteine levels on the risk of coronary heart disease or acute myocardial infarction: A Mendelian randomization study Percutaneous Support Devices for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Switching P2Y12-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease Current Smoking and Prognosis After Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: New Pathophysiological Insights Canadian spontaneous coronary artery dissection cohort study: in-hospital and 30-day outcomes Interval From Initiation of Prasugrel to Coronary Angiography in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction An open-Label, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist and aspirin vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the AUGUSTUS trial Healed Culprit Plaques in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
|<<... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 >>|

Clinical Trial2018 Jul 19.[Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL：Circulation. Article Link

Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction - The Randomized SHOCK-COOL Trial

Fuernau G, Beck J, Thiele H et al. Keywords: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Acute Heart Failure, Interventions and ACS

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Experimental trials suggest improved outcome by mild therapeutic hypothermia for cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to investigate hemodynamic effects of mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.


METHODS - Patients (n=40) with cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention without classical indication for mild therapeutic hypothermia underwent randomization in a 1:1 fashion to mild therapeutic hypothermia for 24 h or control. The primary endpoint was cardiac power index at 24 h; secondary endpoints included other hemodynamic parameters as well as serial measurements of arterial lactate.


RESULTS - No relevant differences were observed for the primary endpoint cardiac power index at 24 h (mild therapeutic hypothermia vs. control: 0.41 [interquartile range 0.31-0.52] vs. 0.36 [inter-quartile range 0.31-0.48] W/m2; p=0.50, median difference -0.025 [95% confidence interval -0.12 to 0.06 W/m2]). Similarly, all other hemodynamic measurements were not statistically different. Arterial lactate levels at 6, 8 and 10 hours were significantly higher in patients in the MTH group with a slower decline (p for interaction 0.03). There were no differences in 30-day mortality: (60 vs. 50%, hazard ratio 1.27 [95% confidence interval 0.55-2.94]; p=0.55).


CONCLUSIONS - In this randomized trial mild therapeutic hypothermia failed to show a substantial beneficial effect in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction on cardiac power index at 24 h.


CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION - URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01890317.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top