CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

急性冠脉综合征

Abstract

Recommended Article

An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group BMI, Infarct Size, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary PCI Patient-Level Analysis From 6 Randomized Trials Triage Considerations for Patients Referred for Structural Heart Disease Intervention During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: An ACC /SCAI Consensus Statement Effect of Smoking on Outcomes of Primary PCI in Patients With STEMI Evaluation and Management of Nonculprit Lesions in STEMI High-Sensitivity Troponin and The Application of Risk Stratification Thresholds in Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome A randomised trial comparing two stent sizing strategies in coronary bifurcation treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - The Absorb Bifurcation Coronary (ABC) trial New technologies for intensive prevention programs after myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the NET-IPP trial

Clinical Trial2018 Jun;107(6):517-523.

JOURNAL:Clin Res Cardiol. Article Link

Revision: prognostic impact of baseline glucose levels in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock-a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial

Abdin A, Pöss J, Thiele H et al. Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; blood glucose; cardiogenic shock; hyperglycemia; prognosis

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Limited data from observational retrospective studies suggest an association between glucose levels and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of glucose at admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by CS included in the largest CS trial to date, the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.


METHODS AND RESULTS - In the IABP-SHOCK II-trial, patients with CS complicating AMI undergoing early revascularization were randomized to a therapy with vs. without IABP support. Primary and secondary endpoints were mortality within 30 days and 1 year, respectively. Glucose levels were examined at admission. Glucose levels were available in 513 patients. In total, 33.7% of the patients had known diabetes. Patients with diabetes had higher glucose levels compared to those without diabetes (median [interquartile range (IQR)] 13.1 mmol/L [IQR 9.5-18.3] vs. 10.8 mmol/L [IQR 7.8-15.4], p = 0.0003). Patients with glucose concentrations above the median (11.5 mmol/L) had higher 30-day and 1-year mortality compared to those below the median (47.7 vs. 36.5%, p = 0.004; 57.7 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.011, respectively). This negative prognostic impact of increased glucose levels remained significant in multivariate adjustment and was not influenced even after adjustment for the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus.


CONCLUSIONS - In patients with CS complicating AMI, increased glucose concentration at admission was an independent predictor for mortality at 30-days and 1-year, independently of the diabetic state.