CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

急性冠脉综合征

Abstract

Recommended Article

Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of DAPT disruption due to non-compliance vs. bleeding after PCI: insights from the PARIS Registry Another Nail in the Coffin for Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsion in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock Refractory Angina: From Pathophysiology to New Therapeutic Nonpharmacological Technologies Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction No causal effects of plasma homocysteine levels on the risk of coronary heart disease or acute myocardial infarction: A Mendelian randomization study SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 Effects of clopidogrel vs. prasugrel vs. ticagrelor on endothelial function, inflammatory parameters, and platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary artery stenting: a randomized, blinded, parallel study Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Original Research2019 Jul;12(7):e005103.

JOURNAL:Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Article Link

Comparative Effectiveness of β-Blocker Use Beyond 3 Years After Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Outcomes Among Elderly Patients

Shavadia JS, Holmes DN, Thomas L et al. Keywords: 3-year post-MI survivors; β-blocker; elderly; observational study; long-term cardiovascular outcomes

FULL TEXT PDF