CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

充血性心力衰竭

Abstract

Recommended Article

The Role of the Pericardium in Heart Failure: Implications for Pathophysiology and Treatment Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction-Is it Possible to Escape One’s Past? The conductive function of biopolymer corrects myocardial scar conduction blockage and resynchronizes contraction to prevent heart failure A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Reduced Apolipoprotein M and Adverse Outcomes Across the Spectrum of Human Heart Failure The Future of Biomarker-Guided Therapy for Heart Failure After the Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure (GUIDE-IT) Study INTERMACS Profiles and Outcomes Among Non–Inotrope-Dependent Outpatients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction The Evolution of β-Blockers in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure (Part 1/5)

Review Article19 December 2020

JOURNAL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/e Article Link

Is Acute heart failure a distinctive disorder? An analysis from BIOSTAT-CHF

BA Davison, S Senger, IE Sama et al. Keywords: acute heart failure; HF outpatients; diagnosis; treatment;

ABSTRACT

AIMS -This retrospective analysis sought to identify markers that might distinguish between acute heart failure (HF) and worsening HF in chronic outpatients.


METHODS AND RESULTS -The BIOSTAT‐CHF index cohort included 2516 patients with new or worsening HF symptoms: 1694 enrolled as inpatients (acute HF) and 822 as outpatients (worsening HF in chronic outpatients). A validation cohort included 935 inpatients and 803 outpatients. Multivariable models were developed in the index cohort using clinical characteristics, routine laboratory values, and proteomics data to examine which factors predict adverse outcomes in both conditions and to determine which factors differ between acute HF and worsening HF in chronic outpatients, validated in the validation cohort.

Patients with acute HF had substantially higher morbidity and mortality (6 months mortality was 12..3% for acute HF and 4..7% for worsening HF in chronic outpatients). Multivariable models predicting 180‐day mortality and 180‐day HF re‐admission differed substantially between acute HF and worsening HF in chronic outpatients. CA‐125 was the strongest single biomarker to distinguish acute HF from worsening HF in chronic outpatients, but only yielded a C‐index of 0..71. A model including multiple biomarkers and clinical variables achieved a high degree of discrimination with a C‐index of 0..913 in the index cohort and 0..901 in the validation cohort.


CONCLUSION - The study identifies different characteristics and predictors of outcome in acute HF patients as compared to outpatients with chronic HF developing worsening HF. The markers identified may be useful in better diagnosing acute HF and may become targets for treatment development.