CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Recommended Article

Outcomes and Effect of Treatment According to Etiology in HFrEF An Analysis of PARADIGM-HF How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Noninvasive Imaging for the Evaluation of Diastolic Function: Promises Fulfilled 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Stage B heart failure: management of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction Lateral Wall Dysfunction Signals Onset of Progressive Heart Failure in Left Bundle Branch Block Myofibroblast Phenotype and Reversibility of Fibrosis in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure

Clinical TrialVolume 6, Issue 10, October 2018

JOURNAL:JACC: Heart Failure Article Link

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation

Abraham WT, Kuck KH, FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. Keywords: heart failure; exercise tolerance; peak Vo2; QRS duration; quality of life

ABSTRACT



OBJECTIVES - This study sought to confirm a subgroup analysis of the prior FIX-HF-5 (Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure) study showing that cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) improved exercise tolerance (ET) and quality of life in patients with ejection fractions between 25% and 45%.


BACKGROUND - CCM therapy for New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III and IV heart failure (HF) patients consists of nonexcitatory electrical signals delivered to the heart during the absolute refractory period.


METHODS - A total of 160 patients with NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms, QRS duration <130 ms, and ejection fraction 25% and 45% were randomized to continued medical therapy (control, n = 86) or CCM (treatment, n = 74, unblinded) for 24 weeks. Peak Vo2 (primary endpoint), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, NYHA functional class, and 6-min hall walk were measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Bayesian repeated measures linear modeling was used for the primary endpoint analysis with 30% borrowing from the FIX-HF-5 subgroup. Safety was assessed by the percentage of patients free of device-related adverse events with a pre-specified lower bound of 70%.


RESULTS - The difference in peak Vo2 between groups was 0.84 (95% Bayesian credible interval - 0.123 to 1.552) ml O2/kg/min, satisfying the primary endpoint. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p < 0.001), and 6-min hall walk (p = 0.02) were all better in the treatment versus control group. There were 7 device-related events, yielding a lower bound of 80% of patients free of events, satisfying the primary safety endpoint. The composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations was reduced from 10.8% to 2.9% (p = 0.048).


CONCLUSIONS - CCM is safe, improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in the specified group of HF patients, and leads to fewer HF hospitalizations. (Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure; NCT01381172).


Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.