CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Recommended Article

Nuclear Imaging of the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System: A Disease-Specific Interpretation in Heart Failure Atrial Fibrillation and the Prognostic Performance of Biomarkers in Heart Failure Rationale and design of the GUIDE-IT study: Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure Natriuretic Peptide-Guided Heart Failure Therapy After the GUIDE-IT Study The spectrum of heart failure: value of left ventricular ejection fraction and its moving trajectories The year in cardiology: heart failure: The year in cardiology 2019 Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure Clinical applications of machine learning in the diagnosis, classification, and prediction of heart failure

Original ResearchVolume 72, Issue 19, November 2018

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

sST2 Predicts Outcome in Chronic Heart Failure Beyond NT−proBNP and High-Sensitivity Troponin T

M Emdin, A Aimo, G Vergaro et al. Keywords: heart failure; NT-proBNP; prognosis; sST2; troponin T

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) is a biomarker related to inflammation and fibrosis.

 

OBJECTIVES - This study assessed the independent prognostic value of sST2 in chronic heart failure (HF).

 

METHODS - Individual patient data from studies that assessed sST2 for risk prediction in chronic HF, together with N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), were retrieved.

 

RESULTS - A total of 4,268 patients were evaluated (median age 68 years, 75% males, 65% with ischemic HF, 87% with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%). NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and sST2 were 1,360 ng/l (interquartile interval: 513 to 3,222 ng/l), 18 ng/l (interquartile interval: 9 to 33 ng/l), and 27 ng/l (interquartile interval: 20 to 39 ng/l), respectively. During a 2.4-year median follow-up, 1,319 patients (31%) experienced all-cause death (n = 932 [22%] for cardiovascular causes). Among the 4,118 patients (96%) with available data, 1,029 (24%) were hospitalized at least once for worsening HF over 2.2 years. The best sST2 cutoff for the prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization was 28 ng/ml, with good performance at Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank: 117.6, 61.0, and 88.6, respectively; all p < 0.001). In a model that included age, sex, body mass index, ischemic etiology, LVEF, New York Heart Association functional class, glomerular filtration rate, HF medical therapy, NT-proBNP, and hs-TnT, the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization increased by 26%, 25%, and 30%, respectively, per each doubling of sST2. sST2 retained its independent prognostic value across most population subgroups.

 

CONCLUSIONS - sST2 yielded strong, independent predictive value for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalization in chronic HF, and deserves consideration to be part of a multimarker panel together with NT-proBNP and hs-TnT.