CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Recommended Article

Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines The Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: An Expert Panel Consensus From ACE Inhibitors/ARBs to ARNIs in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure (Part 2/5) Dilated cardiomyopathy: so many cardiomyopathies! A population-based study of 92 clinically recognised risk factors for heart failure: co-occurrence, prognosis and preventive potential Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure Heart Failure Outcomes With Volume-Guided Management

Review Article2018 Mar 1;254:224-229.

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Determinants of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Montero D, Diaz-Canestro C. Keywords: Exercise tolerance; Fick determinants; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND -  Severe exercise intolerance (EI), demonstrated by impaired peak oxygen consumption, intrinsically characterizes heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Controversy exists on the determinants of EI in patients with HFpEF according to case-control studies. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and clarify the main (Fick) determinants of EI in HFpEF.

 

METHODS -  We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science since their inceptions until January 2017 for articles assessing peak cardiac output and/or arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO2diffpeak) with incremental exercise in patients diagnosed with HFpEF and age-matched control individuals. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) in peak cardiac index (CIpeak) and a-vO2diffpeak between HFpEF and control groups. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to evaluate potential moderating factors.

 

RESULTS -  Ten studies were included after systematic review, comprising a total of 213 HFpEF patients and 179 age-matched control individuals (mean age=51-73years). After data pooling, CIpeak (n=392, SMD=-1.42; P<0.001) and a-vO2diffpeak (n=228, SMD=-0.52; P=0.002) were impaired in HFpEF patients. In subgroup analyses, a-vO2diffpeak was reduced in HFpEF versus healthy individuals (n=114, SMD=-0.85; P<0.001) but not compared with control patients without heart failure (n=92, SMD=-0.12; P=0.57). The SMD in a-vO2diffpeak was negatively associated with age (B=-0.05, P=0.046), difference in % females (B=-0.01, P=0.026) and prevalence of hypertension (B=-0.01, P=0.015) between HFpEF and control groups.

 

CONCLUSIONS -  HFpEF is associated with a predominant impairment of CIpeak, accompanied by sex- and comorbidity-dependent reduced oxygen extraction at peak exercise.

Copyright @ 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.