CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Recommended Article

Diagnosis of Nonischemic Stage B Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Parameters for Prediction of Heart Failure Haemodynamic-guided management of heart failure (GUIDE-HF): a randomised controlled trial Change in plasma volume and prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure: an observational cohort study Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure With Recovered Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: JACC Scientific Expert Panel The Role of the Pericardium in Heart Failure: Implications for Pathophysiology and Treatment Outcomes and Effect of Treatment According to Etiology in HFrEF An Analysis of PARADIGM-HF Noninvasive Imaging for the Evaluation of Diastolic Function: Promises Fulfilled

Original Research2018 Oct;11(10):1390-1400.

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Article Link

Diagnosis of Nonischemic Stage B Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Parameters for Prediction of Heart Failure

Wang Y, Yang H, Marwick TH et al. Keywords: T2DM; community; echocardiography; global longitudinal strain; stage B heart failure; subclinical LV dysfunction

ABSTRACT

 

OBJECTIVES - This study sought to identify whether impaired global longitudinal strain (GLS), diastolic dysfunction (DD), or left atrial enlargement (LAE) should be added to stage B heart failure (SBHF) criteria in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

 

BACKGROUND - SBHF is a precursor to clinical heart failure (HF), and its recognition justifies initiation of cardioprotective therapy. However, original definitions of SBHF were based on LV hypertrophy and impaired ejection fraction.

 

METHODS - Patients with asymptomatic type 2 diabetes mellitus 65 years of age (age 71 ± 4 years; 55% men) with preserved ejection fraction and no ischemic heart disease were recruited from a community-based population. All underwent a standard clinical evaluation, and a comprehensive echocardiogram, including assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), LAE, DD (abnormal E/e'), and GLS (<16%). Over a median follow-up of 1.5 years (range 0.5 to 3), 20 patients were lost to follow-up, and 290 individuals were entered into the final analyses.

 

RESULTS - In this asymptomatic group, LV dysfunction was identified in 30 (10%) by DD, 68 (23%) by LVH, 102 (35%) by LAE, and 68 (23%) by impaired GLS. New-onset HF developed in 45 patients and 4 died, giving an event rate of 112/1,000 person-years. Survival free of the composite endpoint (HF and death) was about 1.5-fold higher in patients without a normal, compared with an abnormal echocardiogram. LVH, LAE, and GLS <16% were associated with increased risk of the composite endpoint, independent of ARIC risk score and glycosylated hemoglobin, but abnormal E/e' was not. The addition of left atrial volume and GLS provided incremental value to the current standard of clinical risk (ARIC score) and LVH. In a competing-risks regression analysis, LVH (hazard ratio: 2.90; p < 0.001) and GLS <16% (hazard ratio: 2.26; p = 0.008), but not DD and LAE were associated with incident HF.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction is prevalent in asymptomatic elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and impaired GLS is independent and incremental to LVH in the prediction of incident HF.

 

Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.