CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防

Abstract

Recommended Article

Short-Term Progression of Multiterritorial Subclinical Atherosclerosis Summary of Updated Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes High-Risk Coronary Plaque Regression After Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in Nonbstructive Coronary Disease: A Randomized Study Primary Prevention Trial Designs Using Coronary Imaging: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial Negative Risk Markers for Cardiovascular Events in the Elderly Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes

Original Research2022 Mar, 79 (8) 757–768

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Independent Association of Lipoprotein(a) and Coronary Artery Calcification With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk

A Mehta, N Vasquez, CR Ayers et al. Keywords: Lp(a); coronary artery calcium score; cumulative ASCVD incidence;

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score are individually associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk but have not been studied in combination.

 

OBJECTIVES - This study sought to investigate the independent and joint association of Lp(a) and CAC with ASCVD risk.

 

METHODS - Plasma Lp(a) and CAC were measured at enrollment among asymptomatic participants of the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) (n = 4,512) and DHS (Dallas Heart Study) (n = 2,078) cohorts. Elevated Lp(a) was defined as the highest race-specific quintile, and 3 CAC score categories were studied (0, 1-99, and 100). Associations of Lp(a) and CAC with ASCVD risk were evaluated using risk factoradjusted Cox regression models.

 

RESULTS - Among MESA participants (61.9 years of age, 52.5% women, 36.8% White, 29.3% Black, 22.2% Hispanic, and 11.7% Chinese), 476 incident ASCVD events were observed during 13.2 years of follow-up. Elevated Lp(a) and CAC score (1-99 and 100) were independently associated with ASCVD risk (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.04-1.61; HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.30-2.16; and HR: 2.66; 95% CI: 2.07-3.43, respectively), and Lp(a)-by-CAC interaction was not noted. Compared with participants with nonelevated Lp(a) and CAC = 0, those with elevated Lp(a) and CAC 100 were at the highest risk (HR: 4.71; 95% CI: 3.01-7.40), and those with elevated Lp(a) and CAC = 0 were at a similar risk (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.73-2.35). Similar findings were observed when guideline-recommended Lp(a) and CAC thresholds were considered, and findings were replicated in the DHS.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Lp(a) and CAC are independently associated with ASCVD risk and may be useful concurrently for guiding primary prevention therapy decisions.