CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

经导管主动脉瓣置换

Abstract

Recommended Article

Chimney technique in a TAVR-in-TAVR procedure with high risk of left main artery ostium occlusion Prevalence and clinical implications of valvular calcification on coronary computed tomography angiography Expert Recommendations on Cardiac Computed Tomography for Planning Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Health Status after Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Bioprosthetic valve oversizing is associated with increased risk of valve thrombosis following TAVR The Utility of Rapid Atrial Pacing Immediately Post-TAVR to Predict the Need for Pacemaker Implantation Timing of Intervention in Aortic Stenosis Predictors of high residual gradient after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 24, December 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Follow-Up in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

E Minamino-Muta, T Kato, the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators et al. Keywords: conservative treatment; left ventricular ejection fraction; severe aortic stenosis

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) managed conservatively.

 

BACKGROUND - No previous study has explored the association between LVEF decline during follow-up and clinical outcomes in patients with severe AS.

 

METHODS - Among 3,815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the multicenter CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry in Japan, 839 conservatively managed patients who underwent echocardiography at 1-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was a composite of AS-related deaths and hospitalization for heart failure.

 

RESULTS - There were 91 patients (10.8%) with >10% declines in LVEF and 748 patients (89.2%) without declines. Left ventricular dimensions and the prevalence of valve regurgitation and atrial fibrillation or flutter significantly increased in the group with declines in LVEF. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the group with declines in LVEF than in the group with no decline (39.5% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of decline in LVEF over no decline for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 3.06). When stratified by LVEF at index echocardiography (70%, 60% to 69%, and <60%), the risk of decline in LVEF on the primary outcome was consistently seen in all the subgroups, without any interaction (p = 0.77).

 

CONCLUSIONS - Patients with severe AS with >10% declines in LVEF at 1 year after diagnosis had worse AS-related clinical outcomes than those without declines in LVEF under conservative management. (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Registry; UMIN000012140)