CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract

Recommended Article

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines Increased Risk of Valvular Heart Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: An Underrecognized Cardiac Complication Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Familial Hypercholesterolemia and its Role in the Progression of Calcific Aortic Stenosis Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing to 25 Years Delirium After TAVR: Crosspassing the Limit of Resilience Raising the Evidentiary Bar for Guideline Recommendations for TAVR: JACC Review Topic of the Week Prevalence and Outcomes of Concomitant Aortic Stenosis and Cardiac Amyloidosis Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement During Pregnancy

Original ResearchVolume 13, Issue 6, March 2020

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Coronary Access After TAVR

T Ochiai, T Chakravarty, SH Yoon et al. Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; coronary angiography; CAD; PCI; TAVR

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of unfavorable coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using post-implantation computed tomography (CT).

 

BACKGROUND - Real-world data regarding coronary access after TAVR assessed using post-implantation CT are scarce.

 

METHODS - Post-TAVR CT of 66 patients treated with Evolut R or Evolut PRO valves and 345 patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves were analyzed. The distance from inflow of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) to the coronary ostia and the overlap between THV commissures and the coronary ostia were assessed. Coronary access was defined as unfavorable if the coronary ostium was below the skirt or in front of the THV commissural posts above the skirt in each coronary artery.

 

RESULTS - CT-identified features of unfavorable coronary access were observed in 34.8% (n = 23) for the left coronary artery and 25.8% (n = 17) for the right coronary artery in the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, while those percentages were 15.7% (n = 54) for the left coronary artery and 8.1% (n = 28) for the right coronary artery in the SAPIEN 3 group. In the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, 16 coronary engagements were performed after TAVR, while 64 coronary engagements were performed in the SAPIEN 3 group after TAVR. In an engagement-level analysis, the success rates of selective coronary engagement were significantly lower in patients with CT-identified features of unfavorable coronary access compared with those with favorable coronary access in both the Evolut R/Evolut PRO (0.0% vs. 77.8%; p = 0.003) and SAPIEN 3 (33.3% vs. 91.4%; p = 0.003) groups.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Coronary access may be challenging in a significant proportion of patients after TAVR. THVs with low skirt or commissure height and large open cells that are designed to achieve commissure-to-commissure alignment with the native aortic valve may facilitate future coronary access. (Assessment of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis and Its Treatment With Anticoagulation [RESOLVE]; NCT02318342)