CBS - The 17th Left Main & Coronary Bifurcation Summit, CBS2025

CBS 2019

CBSMD教育中心

HOME
CBS 2019
At CBS

General Information

Left Main & Coronary Bifurcation Summit (CBS) was founded in 2006 as a think tank dedicated to the treatment of left main and coronary bifurcation lesions. CBS aims to improve cardiological care by refreshing fundamental researches, clinical trials, yearly published guidelines, emerged ideas and case-based discussion.

Association and Affiliations
- Organized by
  
  Nanjing Heart Center
  
  Asian Bifurcation Club (ABC)
  
  Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
- Co-organized by
  
  Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC)
  
  Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center,National Health and Family Planning Commission (CBCEC)
  
  American Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)
  
  Asian Heart Society (AHS)
Contact Us
- Registration Administration of Domestic Representatives
  
  Hongjuan Peng : +86-13913895477
  
  Haimei Xu +86-13914736846
  
  cbsnj@cbsmd.cn
- Registration Administration of Overseas Representatives
  
  Ling Lin : +86 (25) 52271398
  
  +86-13951884596
  
  cbs@cbsmd.cn
- Management of Challenging Cases
  
  Yingying Zhao :+86-13815408517
  
  sub@cbsmd.cn
Address

CBS2019 Congress Secretariat, Nanjing First Hospital, Building No.9 68# Changle Road, Nanjing, China

210006
FACULTY
FACULTY

General Chairman
Congress Chairman
Course Directors International Faculty Domestic Faculty Hong Kong and Taiwan Faculty Members of Academic Committee
Education Center

Education Center

• Online Education (For more customized user interface with self-defined collection of research papers and education resources.)

• CBS Education Resource

• CBSMD Scientific Library
SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY

SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY

Research Paper

> Acute Coronary Syndrom

> ASCVD Prevention

> Bifurcation Stenting

> Cardio-Oncology

> Congestive Heart Failure

> DAPT Duration

> Drug Coated Balloon

> Fractional Flow Reserve

> IVUS Guidance

> Optical Coherence Tomography

> Pulmonary Hypertension

> Rotational Atherectomy

> Shear Stress

> Stenting Left Main

> Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

> Percutaneous LAA Occlusion

> Mitral/Tricuspid Valvular Disease

> Other Relevant Articles

Recommended Paper

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-up

CSC Expert Consensus on Principles of Clinical Management of Patients with Severe Emergent Cardiovascular Diseases during the COVID-19 Epidemic

ACC Clinical Bulletin Focuses on Cardiac Implications of Coronavirus (COVID-19)

< >

HOME | SCIENTIFIC LIBRARY | Scientific Library

Scientific Library

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence? Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial Guideline‐Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction: A Patient‐Pooled Analysis From the KorHF and KorAHF Registries Two-year outcomes following unprotected left main stenting with first vs new-generation drug-eluting stents: the FINE registry. EuroIntervention. 2019 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Risk Assessment, Management, and Clinical Trajectory of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Readmission and Mortality After Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

Sort by hits |<<... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ...>>|

Expert Opinion2017 Feb 28;135(9):819-821.

JOURNAL：Circulation Article Link

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence?

Gersh BJ, Stone GW, Bhatt DL et al. Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary artery disease; stenting

ABSTRACT

Approximately 60 randomized controlled trials performed over the last 3 decades have failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences in death or myocardial infarction (MI) between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), apart from a few notable exceptions in which CABG was superior to PCI. The benefits for CABG have been reported in patients with diabetes mellitus with multivessel disease and in patients with and without diabetes mellitus with 3-vessel disease and intermediate or high SYNTAX trial (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores (≥23).

>CBS

CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

CBS 2019

CBS 2019 FACULTY

Education Resource

CBSMD Scientific Library