CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Anatomical and Functional Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes After Orbital Atherectomy of Severely Calcified Left Main Lesions: Analysis of the ORBIT II Study Thirty-Day Outcomes Following Transfemoral Transseptal Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Intrepid TMVR Early Feasibility Study Results Five-Year Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Following Rotational Atherectomy for Heavily Calcified Lesions Cardio-Oncology: How New Targeted Cancer Therapies and Precision Medicine Can Inform Cardiovascular Discovery Applications of left ventricular strain measurements to patients undergoing chemotherapy
|<<... 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 ...>>|

Review ArticleVolume 75, Issue 9, March 2020

JOURNAL：J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

C Yerasi, BC Case, BJ Forrestal et al. Keywords: CAD; DCB; drug-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-coated balloon; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; small-vessel disease

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent is the most common mode of revascularization for coronary artery disease. However, restenosis rates remain high. Non-stent-based local drug delivery by a drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been investigated, as it leaves no metallic mesh. A DCB consists of a semicompliant balloon coated with antiproliferative agents encapsulated in a polymer matrix, which is released into the wall after inflation and contact with the intima. DCB have demonstrated effectiveness in treating in-stent restenosis. Clinical studies using DCB in de novo coronary artery disease have shown mixed results, with a major benefit in small-vessel disease. Differences in study results are not only due to variations in DCB technology but also to disparity in procedural approach, “leave nothing behind” or “combination therapy,” and vessel size. This review focuses on the available evidence from randomized trials and proposes a design for future clinical trials.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top