CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Drug-eluting balloons in coronary interventions: the quiet revolution? Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2020: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials Cardiac MRI Endpoints in Myocardial Infarction Experimental and Clinical Trials JACC Scientific Expert Panel De-escalation of antianginal medications after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Frequency and relationship with health status Plaque progression assessed by a novel semi-automated quantitative plaque software on coronary computed tomography angiography between diabetes and non-diabetes patients: A propensity-score matching study Clinical trial design and rationale of the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) investigational device exemption clinical study protocol Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Review ArticleVolume 75, Issue 9, March 2020

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

C Yerasi, BC Case, BJ Forrestal et al. Keywords: CAD; DCB; drug-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-coated balloon; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; small-vessel disease

ABSTRACT


Percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent is the most common mode of revascularization for coronary artery disease. However, restenosis rates remain high. Non-stent-based local drug delivery by a drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been investigated, as it leaves no metallic mesh. A DCB consists of a semicompliant balloon coated with antiproliferative agents encapsulated in a polymer matrix, which is released into the wall after inflation and contact with the intima. DCB have demonstrated effectiveness in treating in-stent restenosis. Clinical studies using DCB in de novo coronary artery disease have shown mixed results, with a major benefit in small-vessel disease. Differences in study results are not only due to variations in DCB technology but also to disparity in procedural approach, “leave nothing behind” or “combination therapy,” and vessel size. This review focuses on the available evidence from randomized trials and proposes a design for future clinical trials.