CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

Stenting Left Main

科研文章

荐读文献

Meta-Analysis of Comparison of 5-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery in the Era of Drug-eluting Stents Two-year outcomes of everolimus vs. paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of unprotected left main lesions: a propensity score matching comparison of patients included in the French Left Main Taxus (FLM Taxus) and the LEft MAin Xience (LEMAX) registries Ten-Year All-Cause Death According to Completeness of Revascularization in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study Drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (SENIOR): a randomised single-blind trial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis What Is the Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Left Main Coronary Stenosis? Why NOBLE and EXCEL Are Consistent With Each Other and With Previous Trials Long-term results after PCI of unprotected distal left main coronary artery stenosis: the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen (BBK)-Left Main Registry Current treatment of significant left main coronary artery disease: A review

Original Research2017 May;89(6):955-963.

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30-day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients

Minges KE, Herrin J, Fiorilli PN et al. Keywords: Medicare; health care outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality improvement; risk stratification

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - To develop a risk model that can be used to identify PCI patients at higher risk of readmission who may benefit from additional resources at the time of discharge.

 

BACKGROUND - A high proportion of patients undergoing PCI are readmitted within 30 days of discharge.

 

METHODS - The sample comprised patients aged 65 years who underwent PCI at a CathPCI Registry®-participating hospital and could be linked with 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims between 01/2007 and 12/2009. The sample (n = 388,078) was randomly divided into risk score development (n = 193,899) and validation (n = 194,179) cohorts. We did not count as readmissions those associated with staged revascularization procedures. Multivariable logistic regression models using stepwise selection models were estimated to identify variables independently associated with all-cause 30-day readmission.

 

RESULTS - The mean 30-day readmission rates for the development (11.36%) and validation (11.35%) cohorts were similar. In total, 19 variables were significantly associated with risk of 30-day readmission (P < 0.05), and model c-statistics were similar in the development (0.67) and validation (0.66) cohorts. The simple risk score based on 14 variables identified patients at high and low risk of readmission. Patients with a score of 13 (15.4% of sample) had more than an 18.5% risk of readmission, while patients with a score 6 (41.9% of sample) had less than an 8% risk of readmission.

 

CONCLUSION - Among PCI patients, risk of readmission can be estimated using clinical factors present at the time of the procedure. This risk score may guide clinical decision-making and resource allocation for PCI patients at the time of hospital discharge. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

 

© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.