CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

DAPT Duration

科研文章

荐读文献

Elaborately Engineering a Self-Indicating Dual-Drug Nanoassembly for Site-Specific Photothermal-Potentiated Thrombus Penetration and Thrombolysis Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration in Medically Managed Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: Sub-Analysis of the OPT-CAD Study 6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Patient-oriented composite endpoints and net adverse clinical events with ticagrelor monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial Antibody-Based Ticagrelor Reversal Agent in Healthy Volunteers Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration: Reconciling the Inconsistencies Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation Dual Antiplatelet TherapyIs It Time to Cut the Cord With Aspirin? Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI

Original Research2013 Feb;81(3):407-16.

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in a real world population

Hur SH, Kang SJ, Park SJ et al. Keywords: IVUS guided PCI; angiography-guided PCI; DES; outcome

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES -  To compare long-term clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large "real world" registry.


BACKGROUND - The impact of IVUS-guided PCI on clinical outcomes remains unclear.


METHODS - Between January 1998 and February 2006, 8,371 patients who underwent IVUS- (n = 4,627) or angiography- (n = 3,744) guided PCI were consecutively enrolled. Three-year clinical outcomes were compared after adjustment for inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) in the overall population and in separate populations according to stent type.


RESULTS - A crude analysis of the overall population showed that the 3-year mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group than in the angiography-guided group (96.4% ± 0.3% vs. 93.6% ± 0.4%, log-rank P < 0.001). When adjusted by IPTW, patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI remained at lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.627; 95% CI 0.50-0.79, P < 0.001). Similarly, in the drug-eluting stent (DES) population, the 3-year risk of mortality was significantly lower in patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.33-0.66, P < 0.001). In contrast, IVUS-guided PCI did not reduce the risk of mortality in the bare metal stent population (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.60-1.10, P = 0.185). However, the risks of myocardial infarction (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.63-1.44, P = 0.810), target vessel revascularization (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.86-1.15, P = 0.944), and stent thrombosis (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.53-1.07, P = 0.109) were not associated with IVUS guidance.


CONCLUSIONS - IVUS-guided PCI may reduce long-term mortality when compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. This may encourage the routine use of IVUS for PCI in patients undergoing DES implantation. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

 

Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.