CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

左主干支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Unprotected Left Main Disease: Indications and Optimal Strategies for Percutaneous Intervention Outcomes of patients with and without baseline lipid-lowering therapy undergoing revascularization for left main coronary artery disease: analysis from the EXCEL trial Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial Left Main Bifurcation Angioplasty: Are 2 Stents One Too Many? Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data Two-year outcomes of everolimus vs. paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of unprotected left main lesions: a propensity score matching comparison of patients included in the French Left Main Taxus (FLM Taxus) and the LEft MAin Xience (LEMAX) registries Left main coronary artery disease: importance, diagnosis, assessment, and management

Editorial2019;321(24):2409-2411.

JOURNAL:JAMA. Article Link

Dual Antiplatelet TherapyIs It Time to Cut the Cord With Aspirin?

KM Ziada; DJ Moliterno et al. Keywords: DAPT; 1-month clopidogrel vs. 12 month aspirin and clopidogrel; clinical outcomes; 3 years

ABSTRACT


Since evidence of increased risk of stent thrombosis with first-generation drug-eluting stents surfaced in 20051,2 and the US Food and Drug Administration advised interventional cardiologists to use dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following implantation of drug-eluting stents, the appropriate duration of DAPT has been widely studied and hotly debated. Dual antiplatelet therapy consists of concurrent administration of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. Determining the duration of DAPT requires a balance between 2 objectives: lowering the risk of ischemic events with more intense and longer antiplatelet therapy vs lowering the risk of bleeding events with less intense and shorter antiplatelet therapy. Because second-generation drug-eluting stents are associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis,3 the argument against longer DAPT was revisited. The updated guidelines incorporated such considerations by recommending a shorter duration of DAPT for selected patients, namely those with stable clinical status in whom risk of ischemic events is low.4,5