CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

科研文章

荐读文献

Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Multivalvular Heart Disease Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Next-Day Discharge After Minimalist Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Variation in Practice and Outcomes Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing to 25 Years Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients Early Surgery or Conservative Care for Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Prior Cardiac Surgery in the Randomized PARTNER 2A Trial Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Role of Multimodality Imaging in Common and Complex Clinical Scenarios

Original Research2020 Jul 5;S0167-5273(20)33411-2.

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol . Article Link

Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

M Compagnone, G Marchetti, F Saia et al. Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; degenerated aortic valve bioprosthesis; prosthesis-patient mismatch; TAVR

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Incidence and long-term clinical consequences of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are still unclear.


METHODS - We enrolled 710 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR. PPM was defined as absent if the index orifice area (iEOA) was >0.85 cm2/m2, moderate if the iEOA was between 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2 or severe if the iEOA was <0.65 cm2/m2.

RESULTS - Among the 566 patients fulfilling the study criteria, the distribution of PPM was as follows: 50.5% none ( n = 286), 43% moderate PPM ( n = 243) and 6.5% severe PPM ( n = 37). At 5-year follow-up, patients with severe PPM had a significantly higher incidence of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction and stroke ( p = .025) compared with the other patients. After adjusting the results for possible confounders, severe PPM remained an independent predictor of long-term adverse outcome (HR: 2.46; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.10–5.53). The independent predictors of severe PPM were valve-in-valve procedure and body mass index. Balloon-expandable valves were not associated with higher rates of severe PPM in comparison with self-expandable valves (5% vs. 8%, respectively, p = .245).


CONCLUSIONS -In our study severe PPM emerged as a risk factor for long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.