CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

科学研究

Abstract

Recommended Article

ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy JACC Guideline Comparison: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Discrepancies in Measurement of the Thoracic Aorta: JACC Review Topic of the Week Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation INTERMACS Profiles and Outcomes Among Non–Inotrope-Dependent Outpatients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Subclinical and Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation: Pondering the Knowledge Gap: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Delirium After TAVR: Crosspassing the Limit of Resilience Long-term outcomes following mini-crush versus culotte stenting for the treatment of unprotected left main disease: insights from the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) registry Coronary plaque redistribution after stent implantation is determined by lipid composition: A NIRS-IVUS analysis
|<<... 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ...>>|

Original Research

JOURNAL：Circulation. Article Link

EUROPCR 2019 - ARC Defined High Bleeding Risk in PCI Patients

CBSMD

Pre-reading

Currently available bleeding risk scores are listed in Table 2. PRECISE-DAPT with Class IIb, Evidence A was recommended by ESC in 2017.

These risk scores were developed based on randomized trials with significant heterogeneity with respect to the patient population, such differences highlight the need for a standardized definition of HBR:

1. The differences in eligibility criteria (all-comer, patients at increased bleeding risk) and enrolled patient populations in completed trials are reflected in the differences in bleeding event rates, varies from 3.5-7.3%。

2. Patients unsuitable for long-term DAPT continue to be systematically excluded.

3. Clinical trials of DAPT strategies after stenting have also excluded patients at HBR, with reported major bleeding rates at 1 year varying between 0.3% and 2.8% (Table 1).

4. Subjects at HBR are still underrepresented in contemporary studies.




To optimize the identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk under going PCI, "Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk" proposed the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients under going PCI. This white paper covers 20 criteria (14 major criteria and 6 minor criteria) which can assist clinicians identify patients with 1 major criterion or 2 minor criteria as high bleeding risk rapidly and make clinical decisions accordingly.







>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top