CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

科学研究

Abstract

Recommended Article

Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in a real world population Assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by IVUS and IVUS-based imaging modalities: progression and regression studies, tissue composition and beyond Nuclear Imaging of the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System: A Disease-Specific Interpretation in Heart Failure Fluid Volume Overload and Congestion in Heart Failure: Time to Reconsider Pathophysiology and How Volume Is Assessed Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study Economic and Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Natriuretic Peptide–Guided Therapy for Heart Failure Intravascular ultrasound predictors for edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation The Future of Biomarker-Guided Therapy for Heart Failure After the Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure (GUIDE-IT) Study

Original Research

JOURNAL:Circulation. Article Link

EUROPCR 2019 - ARC Defined High Bleeding Risk in PCI Patients

CBSMD

Pre-reading

Currently available bleeding risk scores are listed in Table 2. PRECISE-DAPT with Class IIb, Evidence A was recommended by ESC in 2017.

These risk scores were developed based on randomized trials with significant heterogeneity with respect to the patient population, such differences highlight the need for a standardized definition of HBR:

1. The differences in eligibility criteria (all-comer, patients at increased bleeding risk) and enrolled patient populations in completed trials are reflected in the differences in bleeding event rates, varies from 3.5-7.3%。

2. Patients unsuitable for long-term DAPT continue to be systematically excluded.

3. Clinical trials of DAPT strategies after stenting have also excluded patients at HBR, with reported major bleeding rates at 1 year varying between 0.3% and 2.8% (Table 1).

4. Subjects at HBR are still underrepresented in contemporary studies.




To optimize the identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk under going PCI, "Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk" proposed the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients under going PCI. This white paper covers 20 criteria (14 major criteria and 6 minor criteria) which can assist clinicians identify patients with 1 major criterion or 2 minor criteria as high bleeding risk rapidly and make clinical decisions accordingly.